ST. GEORGE– A regional chiropractic physician who has actually spent the last year in jail on several felony charges appeared in court Thursday, where both sides presented arguments including the offender's release while awaiting trial, stabilizing public security versus the premise that the accused are innocent until tested guilty.
Brent Noorda, appears for his bail hearing held at 5th District Court in St. George through video from jail, St. George, Utah, Aug. 13, 2020|Image by Cody Blowers, St. George News Brent David Noorda, 40, who deals with 20 second-degree felony counts of sexual abuse, appeared for a bail decrease hearing held in 5th District Court , where both sides argued whether the accused's bail of $200,000 should be decreased. All celebrations made a look by means of video. The charges come from an arrest in August 2019 following an investigation that started at the end of July of last year when a variety of reports of supposed sexual misbehavior were forwarded to the St. George Police Department by the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing. The reports were sent out under the property that Noorda's actions could be a criminal matter that needs to be reported to police for more examination.
During Thursday's hearing, district attorney Zachary Weiland presented a number of witnesses who testified prior to the court in an effort to deter Judge Micheal Westfall from lowering the defendant's bail in the interest of public security. Weiland said that rather of being reduced, it should be raised to $500,000, the amount that was set at the time of Noorda's arrest.
Prosecutor Zachary Weiland argues against bail decrease during Brent Noorda's hearing through video feed at 5th District Court, St. George, Utah, Aug. 13, 2020|Photo by Cody Blowers, St. George News The very first witness testified that she was a client of Noorda's for approximately three years and
also ended up being an employee of the clinic. She testified that Noorda touched her inappropriately on”many”occasions. She said that as a worker, she was routinely asked by Noorda to place on a small-size paper gown– the only size readily available at the clinic– and help him evaluate his equipment, which was several years old. She said the dress, which were purchased particularly by Noorda, exposed much of not just her body however those of the clients too. She also affirmed that throughout much of the exams, Noorda advised that he do a pelvic examination.
During cross evaluation, defense attorney Douglas Terry asked if the doctor had ever carried out a pelvic exam on the individual, to which she said “no” however included that he asked to carry out one “on almost every go to.”
Terry likewise asked about the variety of patients the witness described Noorda over the period of more than 2 years, to which the witness testified there were several, consisting of a teenage patient. He also asked if the individual informed her spouse about the unsuitable interactions. She validated that her spouse was advised but stated the partner never ever faced Noorda.
Upon additional questioning, the witness affirmed that they welcomed Noorda and his family to a Halloween party at their home, which Terry verified was throughout the time of work when the declared misconduct was occurring.
The witness went on to discuss that the depth of the abuse was not recognized until later on, after she was no longer an employee or patient of Noorda's, and she only recognized how major the accused's habits wanted he had harmed one of her member of the family. She likewise stated there has been no contact with the offender since ended her work in 2015.
Upon redirect, it was revealed that Noorda opposed the protective order that was eventually filed by the witness after she terminated their employment, and when Weiland raised the question of the gown, the witness stated that Noorda's response had actually been that it was a shipment concern.
Another witness, who ended up being a patient of Noorda's in 2017, affirmed the doctor bought screening of her hormonal agents, and when the tests were returned, Noorda told the witness she required a breast exam and used to perform the test during the check out.
The witness affirmed that after telling Noorda she would see her obstetrician for that, he continued to bring the provide “during every see,” and when she told Noorda that she had actually the test performed by another doctor, Noorda “ended up being really flustered, and said I shouldn't have made such a big offer out of it.”
The witness said she stopped treatment in 2019 after Noorda “kept bringing up my breasts,” in addition to other concerns that were unrelated to the neck discomfort that triggered her to seek treatment in the first place. She contacted police after Noorda's arrest.
2 other witnesses testified to similar occurrences with Noorda, consisting of sees that included him touching their breasts during more than one examination. Both witnesses said that Noorda's focus was on their breasts and that evaluations consisted of “skin to skin” contact, which during each of the inappropriate contacts, the witnesses were alone with the medical professional and the door was always closed.
One witness affirmed that she felt “broken” during the gos to and that Noorda “would get increasingly more brazen,” including that after she was no longer a patient of Noorda's, she was told by another doctor that Noorda's practices were not within the scope of any approved chiropractic methods.
Throughout cross evaluation with this witness, along with the female who declared the medical professional consistently pushed for a breast examination, Terry asked if they ever had contact with Noorda because stopping treatment. Both witnesses said there had actually been no extra contact.
When it came to arguments related to the defendant's release, Weiland started by saying that Noorda “has a specific fettish … and has actually used that to touch women wrongly.”
“Why would we release a serial sex wrongdoer back out into society?” Weiland stated, including later that “by releasing him, that would be putting Washington County at danger.”
The defense countered by saying that the truth remains that Noorda has beinged in jail for almost a year without being found guilty of any crime, reminding the court that his customer is presumed innocent up until proven guilty.
Terry also said that Noorda presents no hazard to the general public and can not practice his occupation after a momentary suspension was filed within days of his arrest by the Utah Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing. The suspension would remain in effect until the criminal case is fixed. He also stated his customer has not attempted to make any contact with the victims and has actually been a design prisoner while in custody.
The lawyer went on to state that his customer would be digitally kept an eye on upon his release and has a clean rap sheet prior to the existing charges. He added that Noorda's trial is still months away due to court hold-ups resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, which he stated Noorda played no part in and for which he should not be penalized.
When the prosecution was asked if there was any other proof to support the state's position that Noorda presents a threat to the public aside from the claims related to his chiropractic practice, Weiland reacted by stating the offender has “the mind of a sexual predator” and that there are “many victims out there” that the state is still entering into contact with.
In addition, Weiland stated, there are medical records that Noorda would have access to outside of prison, records that haven't even been supplied to the victims. He likewise stated that Noorda acts upon his sexual advises by victimizing those who are weak and susceptible which he would look for victims beyond a medical office to sexually abuse.
Terry reacted by saying that his office was willing to turn all medical records over to the state, including that the state offered no proof there were any other alleged victims that were beyond the scope of the medical practice. Nevertheless, the judge responded by saying that Noorda did in truth hold a position of trust as a medical professional which he could potentially utilize that position to contact the victims or to possibly find future victims.
Once all arguments were heard, Westfall said the court's main issues involve public security, the possibility of Noorda fleeing or stopping working to appear in court and the danger of Noorda contacting his victims, which the judge said there was no evidence presented throughout the hearing that would support those claims.
He likewise repeated that every victim either worked for or was a patient of Noorda, and he asked the state if there were any victims outside of Noorda's medical practice, to which Weiland said the investigation is ongoing and that the state believes there are other victims, which might consist of one that wasn't connected to the medical workplace.
Even so, Westfall bought that Noorda be launched on his own recognizance and placed on house arrest with electronic tracking as soon as plans for suitable housing were confirmed throughout the hearing.
He also enforced terms, ordering that Noorda is forbidden from calling any of the victims and from accessing or ruining any records, and he ordered unique restrictions involving web access.
When the court has confirmed that these arrangements have been made, the defendant will be released.
The judge likewise told Weiland if it is called for that Noorda be jailed on any prospective new charges, then it's up to the prosecution to submit the paperwork.
Copyright St. George News, SaintGeorgeUtah.com LLC, 2020, all rights scheduled.